I can’t resist quoting M’s latest Facebook travel update:
Had almost 40km bicycle ride today to immigration office in Denpasar, it was interesting ride on Bali chaotic road but I feel very safe as all the drivers not aggressive and very patient and calm! Having a couple of Guinness at Kuta beach and watching sunset, actually there was a little earthquake at this morning in Bali, whole hotel was shaking I thought it was someone having sex, I was saying “ what is going on please stop it”
Also on Facebook another friend has sounded a challenging note about multiculturalism. He is referring to an opinion piece in Monday’s Herald.
Dr Justin Koonin is in a bubble and so are all advocates of multiculturalism – a political accommodation for demographic reality but like most governmental sleight of hand, unsustainable and hypocritical. Unsustainable because in a few decades our people will carry the genes from four continents and they will follow a culture that is yet to be experienced. They will not practice one or all of their grandparents customs for they will be imbued with the contemporary Anglo culture. Moreover, a culture incorporates laws governing the conduct and relations of its communities. British law reigns in all Anglo Saxon lands. There is little accommodation for any other legal code. Furthermore, the connection between Hitler and religious freedom is somewhat thin. .
Rather than picking through all that I refer you to some older posts of mine. Not all the internal links in those posts will work, though quite a few still do. That’s one of the downsides of hypertexting meeting time and net decay, but for what they are worth here goes:
It is all very hypothetical though. Religion isn’t about to go away, not in my lifetime or probably in yours. Me, I am a believer in God who does not believe in magic books. So I agree entirely about the dubious morality of much of the Bible, but not of all of the Bible, and ditto for the Quran, though here is an interesting conundrum for the world as Muslims tend to be wedded to the magic book principle even more than Christians or Jews. Rather than go into all that here, I refer you to entries on my archive page under the tag “Bible”.
So I do not identify with this characterisation of religion:
…Rather than a rational discussion of morality culminating in a series of arguments, religious morality is just a set of rules written down on paper, with no attempt at rational explanation and no critical discussion of the issues. Moreover, believers are positively discouraged from thinking for themselves about morality, and are rather indoctrinated or terrified into blindly following whatever their “Holy Book” or “religious teacher” has to say. That’s not morality, it’s tyrannical brainwashing…
Rather, I do lean towards this comment in Meanjin Vol. 65, no. 4, 2006:
Modern-day Christians have to stop thinking that they do not need to engage in dialogue because they have found their good shepherd. Having to engage with those of a different faith is not always comfortable. But in our post-secular society, in which the boundary between belief and unbelief is much less clear than for previous generations, interfaith dialogue is the way of the future…
We are becoming a society in whch secular and religious cultures coexist, and indeed can sometimes learn from each other. In that sense we may be moving to a post-secular generation.
— Constant J Mews, Monash University
Next Is Australia a Christian country? — also from 2007. Finally, from 2011: Being Australian 11: inclusive multiculturalism Aussie style 4.